Tuesday, September 15, 2009

"Gableman ethics case hinges on defining lie"

http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/59290897.html

Haw, haw, haw. That is great. You can't write better material than this. Judges and lawyers fighting over what constitutes a lie. What a hoot! I almost spit up my coffee.

1 comment:

kkdither said...

Never trust a man with baked bean teeth. He did still try to spring the guy from jail, right? He was just unsuccessful...