Wednesday, July 17, 2013

"Colorado town considers licensing bounty hunters to shoot down drones"

"The tiny town of Deer Trail, Colo. — barely more than a wide spot on Interstate 70 about 55 miles east of Denver, population 546 — is considering an ordinance that would authorize licensed bounty hunters to shoot down unmanned aircraft violating its 'sovereign airspace.'

"A six-page petition circulated by a resident says that the threat of surveillance from drones — regardless of who is piloting them — is a threat to 'traditional American ideas of Liberty and Freedom' enjoyed by Deer Trail’s 'ranchers, farmers, cowboys and Indians, as well as contemporary citizens.'

"Therefore, drone incursions are to be seen as acts of war.

"According to the proposed ordinance, which will be considered by the town council at its next meeting on Aug. 6, prospective bounty hunters can get a one-year drone-hunting license for $25.

"Proposed bounties will be $25 for those turning in the wings or fuselage of downed aircraft and $100 for mostly intact vehicles. To collect the bounty, the wreckage must have 'markings, and configuration … consistent with those used by the United States federal government.'

"Such 'trophies' then become the property of Deer Trail."


Drone hunting should be allowed throughout the United States.  Issuing licenses for bounty hunters is a good idea.  However, I believe that any property owner in the USA who sees a drone hovering over his property should be allowed to shoot it without a license. 

5 comments:

  1. Is this really a problem? How many drones are out there hovering? I'm sure pilots of small aircraft are not thrilled about this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder how they will feel if they shoot one down and then get a bill from the government to pay to replace it.
    Or like KK says, what happens if they shoot down a small plane.

    File under stupid sh##.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stupid Sh## an than some. What do you suppose the fine for shooting one of these down would be? Also, HOW do they figure It's THEIR sovereign air space?

    ReplyDelete
  4. KK person brought up a good point, small craft pilots....

    Problems with drones, they don't fly a 100 feet, some of them are way the hell up there and you would need a might powerful scope to see them.....

    Although it is a neat idea or well it's more like a wet dream gone bad...

    ReplyDelete