Judge Chad Kerkman has ruled conflicting and/or altered documents submitted into his court is not only acceptable, it is preferred.
In true 2nd. Judicial District form, corrupt Judge Chad Kerkman upheld the ludicrous ruling of judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz "Attorney Eyes Only" and up played his predecessor Gasiorkiewicz by ruling that tainted records submitted into his court wins the case.
Kerkman's ruling reinforced the saying "if you are not cheating, you are not trying".
Folks, this is a continuation of abuse of judicial power to hide the truth and thwart justice.
City of Racine Attorney Scott Letteney and Michael Cohen of the law firm of
Meissner, Tierney, Fisher & Nichols S.C.
has abused their powers as officers of the court by filing and misrepresenting documents as being true and accurate records before the court. Fact are the documents were misrepresentations of actual files of a power point presentation presented to City of Racine officials.
BE OUTRAGED
BE VERY OUTRAGED !
Ultimately, this falls upon Mayor Cory Mason's continued secret agenda's which include using corrupt courts against the citizens of Racine.
The failure of the court's decision to only allow the City's Power Point Presentation "For Attorney's Eyes Only" has become grossly evident.
This is a court case that initially turned south when Judge Gasiorkiewicz denied Plaintiff's rights to amend her complaint within 6 months.
Eugene Gasiorkiewicz then created the illegal secret court and ordered court documents concerning a Power Point Presentation "For Attorney Eyes Only" claiming the entire presentation as attorney work privilege.
Court records reveal City of Racine Attorney Scott Letenney and Michael Cohen have unscrupulously filed multiple different PowerPoint presentations for the court's review while asserting they are all original files presented to the city's Executive Committee meeting......
It appears that Attorney Cohen and Scott Letteney has committed Fraud Upon the Court by filing numerous PowerPoint presentations that are not accurate filings of the actual PowerPoint presentation to the Executive Committee.
Heavily redacted emails between Cohen and Sandy's attorney Mark Hinkston confirms different versions of the Power Point Presentation were submitted into court records by the City of Racine.
Attorney Michael Cohen
Michael Cohen attempts to minimize his failures by stating: "The differences in the two versions of the PowerPoints are very minor and do not affect the summary judgment decision".
We at RCC disagree with Mr. Cohen because veracity does matter within a legitimate court.
Which begs the questions:
Which affidavits of Michael Cohen's are true?
Within this case no affidavits can now be trusted from
City of Racine Attorneys !
Further the court had concealed from public view an 18 page Plaintiff's Brief filed on January 12th. The court file was hidden from the public on WCCA records and only made known today after RCC had made inquires into the existence of the document.
WTF?
The first $100 dollar question is:
Why would this court continue to conceal court documents from the public?
The second $100 dollar question is:
Why would attorney Cohen file an affidavit indicating his filings lack veracity?
The insanity of this case continues.
The Secrecy of
Kerkman's Korrupt Kourt Kontinues !
Next hearing open to the public
February 10th at 11AM
Kenosha County Courthouse
Want to read the emails?
Send us an email request and we will promptly forward the documents for free.
racinecountycorruption@gmail.com
Disclaimer:
Limited time offer
Some restrictions apply
Not valid where taxed
Not for the faint of heart
Crooked attorneys and other rift raft need not apply
The case of Sandy Weidner vs. City of Racine took another nefarious turn when the City of Racine noticed up the court that they wish to pull some of their submitted documents from the court record and replace them with newly manufactured documents. It appears Sandy's attorney caught city of Racine Attorney Scott Letteney and Michael Cohen submitting some not so Kosher documents into the court record.
Not so kosher means possible probable
fraudulent documents were submitted in an attempt to hide real documents and
mislead the court.
Take a look at all the entries in one day due to false pleadings by City of Racine Attorney Scott Letteney and Attorney Michael Cohen
11-13-2020
Prop. order for judgment
Additional text:
Proposed - Supplemental Order and Judgment Declaring Certain Rights and Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020
Proposed Order
Additional text:
Proposed - Order Sealing and Designating as Attorneys' Eyes Only Portions of Certain Documents
11-13-2020
Exhibit
Additional text:
(Redacted) Exhbit B to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020
Exhibit
Additional text:
(Under Seal) Exhibit B to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020
Exhibit
Additional text:
(Redacted) Exhibit A to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020
Exhibit
Additional text:
(Under Seal) Exhibit A to Michael Cohen Affidavit
11-13-2020
Affidavit in support of motion
Additional text:
Affidavit of Michael J Cohen in Support of the City of Racine's Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020
Exhibit
Additional text:
(Under Seal) Exhibit A to Scott Letteney Affidavit
11-13-2020
Affidavit in support of motion
Additional text:
(Redacted) Second Supplemental Affidavit of Scott R Letteney Correcting Certain Statements Contained in 08-03-20 Supplemental Affidavit and in Support of the City of Racine's Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020
Affidavit in support of motion
Additional text:
(Under Seal) Second Supplemental Affidavit of Scott R Letteney Correcting Certain Statements Contained in 08-03-20 Supplemental Affidavit and in Support of the City of Racine's Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020
Notice of motion, motion
Additional text:
Respondent City of Racine's Notice of Motion and Motion to File Portions of Certain Documents Under Seal and to Designate Certain Portions as Attorneys' Eyes Only Information
11-13-2020
Notice of motion, motion
Additional text:
(Redacted) Respondent City of Racine's Notice of Motion and Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Declaring Certain Rights and Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
11-13-2020
Notice of motion, motion
Additional text:
(Under Seal) Respondent City of Racine's Notice of Motion and Motion to Reopen and Supplement Final Order and Judgment Declaring Certain Rights and Dismissing Petitioner's Claims with Prejudice
RACINE — A group of local private schools, parents and advocacy groups represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty are challenging the City of Racine Health Department’s school closure order in Wisconsin Supreme Court.
The order, issued by Racine’s Public Health Administrator Dottie-Kay Bowersox, would close all school buildings within its jurisdiction from Nov. 27 to Jan. 15 in an effort to keep COVID-19 from spreading in schools during the holiday season. The City Health Department covers Racine, Elmwood Park and Wind Point
In its petition, WILL, a conservative nonprofit legal group based in Milwaukee, asks the Supreme Court to immediately put a halt to the order until a conclusion is reached in a similar case before the court regarding a public health order closing schools in Dane County. In September, the court put a temporary halt to Dane County’s health order until the case is concluded. That Dane County case, in which WILL is representing petitioners as well, is set for oral arguments on Dec. 8.
WILL argues that local public health officers do not have the legal power to order broad school closures.
Letteney
Racine City Attorney Scott Letteney has previously asserted that the Department of Health Services state administrative code does give Racine Public Health Administrator Dottie-Kay Bowersox that power.
As the city of Racine Machinery Row* fiasco continues
to wind its way through the courts, city attorney
Scott Letteney is becoming more desperate to thwart any courtroom advances from plaintiff's.
In recent court filings concerning Sam Azarian et al vs. City of Racine, case #19CV1524, Scott Letteney on September 11, 2020 filed a 40 page document into the Court of Appeals titled "DEFENDANTS PETITIONERS' PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NONFINAL ORDER AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF". In this petition, Letteney questioned the competency of Racine County Circuit Court Judge Jon Fredrickson. "as to whether the circuit court lacks the competency to hear Plaintiffs-Respondents........"
The Court of Appeals promptly calendared Letteney's petition and 10 days later Letteney's petition was denied.
The second major litigant taking the City to task of fraud and illicit dealings concerning Machinery Row is Patrick Fagan.
Plaintiff Patrick Fagan has filed a motion to recuse the city's "go to" judge - Eugene Gasiorkiewicz in case #18CV1227, Patrick Fagan vs. City of Racine/Redevelopment Authority of the City of Racine.
In Patricks' filing he has cited Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz as a judge that "cannot act in an impartial manner", citing Sandy Weidners case #17CV1644, where Gasiorkiewicz acted in a most bias and prejudice manner, wrongly denying litigant Sandy Weidner the statutory right to amend her complaint within six months of filing.
The courtship between Letteney and Neubauer appears to be strained for the time being.
Perhaps Neubauer didn't like Letteney's reference of Judge Fredrickson as lacking competency, or maybe Neubauer doesn't want the wrath of the public to again verbally attack her character.
But keep this in mind, Neubauer still calendared Letteney in ten days, while she failed to calendar Sandy Weidner case for over 4 months until a complaint was filed against her.
And now losing the city's "go to" Judge in the Patrick Fagan vs. City of Racine case has got to hurt.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot defended the Chicago Police Department’s ban on protesters being able to demonstrate on the block where she lives, telling reporters Thursday that she and her family at times require heightened security because of threats she receives daily.Lightfoot refused to elaborate on the specific threats, but said she receives them daily against herself, her wife and her home. Comparisons to how the Police Department has protected previous mayors’ homes, such as Rahm Emanuel’s Ravenswood residence, are unfair because “this is a different time like no other,” Lightfoot told reporters.
Her refusal to “elaborate on the specific threats” stinks of Ed Burke’s routine of claiming he was threatened as the head of the Finance Committee and therefore needed a security detail, a city car and CPD single-digit call sign. When this was in the process of being removed, he manufactured a threat from some senile old man so he could keep his detail.
Then she really demonstrates that she thinks she is far more important that you pissants:
“I think that residents of this city, understanding the nature of the threats that we are receiving on a daily basis, on a daily basis, understand I have a right to make sure that my home is secure,” Lightfoot said.
This from the most virulent anti-gun mayor in Chicago history. A mayor known by insiders to carry a small derringer-type weapon in her ill-fitting suits (her keeping a hand in her pocket all the time is a well known street “tell.”) Guess what Groot? Everyone has that Right, they just don’t have a taxpayer funded army to exercise it.
Remember when certain neighborhoods stood up for themselves and warned interlopers threatening to wreak havoc in their peaceful parts of town that it might be a bad idea? Groot said that residents shouldn’t be taking the law into their own hands….when she had (and continues) to strip peaceful neighborhoods of something that keeps them peaceful. She also wants to deny everyone the Right to own something that keeps her safe every single day and night, even when she isn’t living at her main residence.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot on Thursday defended the heavy police presence outside her Logan Square home, at a time when police officers are stretched to the limit, citing “specific threats” made “every single day” to “my person, my wife and my home.”“Given the threats that I have personally received. Given the threats to my home and my family, I’m gonna do everything to make sure that they are protected. I make no apologies whatsoever for that,” the mayor said.“I’ve talked to my fellow mayors across the country and, seeing the kind of things that have been done to them and their family members, I’m not gonna have that happen. That’s not what my wife and my child signed up for. It’s not what my neighbors signed up for. We have a right in our home to live in peace.”
You know who else didn’t “sign up” for this bitch?
our neighbors
our spouses
our children
But there you are, acting all high and mighty and presuming to be better than the citizens you are supposed to be serving, working the Department to death, undercutting any semblance of authority we might have, encouraging unfounded complaining, denigrating our representatives, and standing idly by while the men and women protecting you have to stand face-to-face with scumbag terrorists who are doxing them in real time, broadcasting their home addresses and encouraging the rape of their daughters.
Oh, you thought we forgot about your silence on that one? You demand protection your family because they didn’t “sign up for this,” but if a cop’s home is attacked or their daughter gets violated while he or she is standing post to protect yours, we’re supposed to what? Think they signed up for it?
You have abandoned the neighborhoods and destroyed downtown. You thought by waving the white flag, they weren’t going to come for you? You are by far the most useless excuse for a politician we have seen in our lifetimes.
UPDATE: Groot is taking a bunch of fire from the Right side of the internet for this:
RATcine — A Racine man has been charged after allegedly yelling at two young girls while holding a baseball bat and apparently accidentally hitting one of the girls.
Lazarick L. Riley, 49, of the 3000 block of 16th Street, was charged with a misdemeanor count of disorderly conduct with use of a dangerous weapon and four counts of misdemeanor bail jumping.
According to a criminal complaint:
At 12:58 p.m. on Tuesday, officers were dispatched to the area of 16th Street and West Boulevard in reference to a man yelling at two 7-9-year-old girls while holding a bat.
Upon arrival, the officers located Riley lying in the front yard of a residence with a metal bat on the ground next to him. The officers observed that Riley smelled of intoxicants and had thick-tongued speech and labored motor skills.
He was belligerent and argumentative with officers, and they believed he was under the influence of alcohol. Riley denied consuming alcohol and that he was just at court that morning for his two open cases.
Officers spoke to a witness who stated he was watching the two girls as they were playing in the garage with their toys.
Riley then arrived, heavily intoxicated, and wanted to enter the home. The witness said that Riley was homeless and sometimes was allowed to stay at the house, but he refused to allow Riley in and that was when Riley went to the garage with the metal bat.
Attorney Michael Cohen
Watch Talking Racine on YouTube ! 
Judge Lisa Neubauer
Scott Letterney
RATcine — A Racine man has been charged after allegedly yelling at two young girls while holding a baseball bat and apparently accidentally hitting one of the girls.
RATcine — A Racine man has been charged after allegedly yelling at two young girls while holding a baseball bat and apparently accidentally hitting one of the girls.
Posts
