Sunday, March 14, 2021

Scandal widens for Andrew Cuomo

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

3 comments:

OrbsCorbs said...

I got my second jab of the Moderna vaccine today. I'll probably be sick as a dog tomorrow, but in two weeks, I'll be bulletproof.

March 14, 2021 at 5:30 PM
TSE said...

Moderna is NOT a vaccine.

The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‑19) for use in individuals 18 years of age and older. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID‑19.

The EUA for the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID‑19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of the vaccine, unless terminated or revoked (after which the vaccine may no longer be used).

Moderna is a biotechnology company founded in 2010. At Moderna, we are pioneering a class of medicines based on messenger RNA (mRNA).

Every cell in your body uses mRNA, which gives instructions to make the proteins your body needs. This affects many aspects of your biology, including health and disease.

We are currently developing mRNA-based vaccines and medicines for a variety of conditions, including COVID‑19.

The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine uses mRNA to provide a blueprint for your cells to build your body’s defense against SARS‑CoV‑2, the virus that causes COVID‑19. The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine does not contain SARS‑CoV‑2, or any virus—just the blueprint to help fight against it. The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine may not protect everyone.

https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/recipients/moderna-vaccine



March 14, 2021 at 5:43 PM
Anonymous said...

f, at this point, you're dumb enough to get the not-vaccine, you really don't have any excuse:

Utah’s chief medical examiner urged the public not to jump to conclusions about the death of a 39-year-old woman four days after she received the second dose of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine — insisting there is no evidence the jab was connected to her passing.

After receiving her second jab on Feb. 1, Kassidi Kurill became sick and was hospitalized. Four days later, the single mom died under mysterious circumstances.

But Dr. Erik Christensen, chief medical examiner for Utah’s Health Department, told Fox News that the tragic mom’s second dose and her death are only “temporally related.” “We don’t have any evidence that there are connections between the vaccines and deaths at this point,” he insisted. “We don’t have any indication of that.”

That's a fascinating excuse. Now we know JFK didn't wasn't assassinated. The rifle firing and his death were only "temporally related". Also, when did New York newspapers start using British slang? Americans don't get "jabs", they get "shots". Is "jab" supposed to be friendlier and less frightening, or more progressive, somehow?

Any time you see someone babbling about evidence, you can be certain they are lying. In this case, the dead body of the woman with the material that was injected would be the evidence, as well as the syringe that was used, the bottle from which the material was taken, and so forth. It's certainly possible that she died of West African Rat Disease or asymptomatic Ebola or even an excess of ennui, but Ockham's Razor strongly suggests that it was the not-vaccine that killed her due to the known exposure and temporal relationship.

I don't what the long-term effects of the genetic markers being applied to a statistically significant percentage of the population will be, but I can certainly think of a lot of different uses for them. And pretty much none of them are good. If you wouldn't have a glowing target tattooed on your forehead, you probably shouldn't submit to genetic therapy by people who openly talk about their desire to reduce the human population.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/03/dont-jump-to-logical-conclusions.html

March 14, 2021 at 5:46 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)