Thursday, January 15, 2009

Holey Moley II

Hey!!! Why aren't they reporting this:

State of Wisconsin vs. Gary Becker
Racine County Case Number 2009CF000047

Charge(s)
Count No. Statute Description Severity
1 948.02(2) 2nd Degree Sexual Assault of Child Felony C
2 948.07(1) Child Enticement-Sexual Contact Felony D
3 948.12(1m) Possession of Child Pornography Felony D
4 948.075(1r) Use a Computer to Facilitate a Child Sex Crime Felony C
5 948.11(2)(a) Expose Child to Harmful Material Felony I
6 946.12(2) Misconduct/Office-Act/Excess Authority Felony I


The most shocking:


948.02 Sexual assault of a child. (1) FIRST DEGREE
SEXUAL ASSAULT. (am) Whoever has sexual contact or sexual
intercourse with a person who has not attained the age of 13 years
and causes great bodily harm to the person is guilty of a Class A
felony.
(b) Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who has not
attained the age of 12 years is guilty of a Class B felony.
(c) Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who has not
attained the age of 16 years by use or threat of force or violence
is guilty of a Class B felony.
(d) Whoever has sexual contact with a person who has not
attained the age of 16 years by use or threat of force or violence
is guilty of a Class B felony if the actor is at least 18 years of age
when the sexual contact occurs.
(e) Whoever has sexual contact with a person who has not
attained the age of 13 years is guilty of a Class B felony.
(2) SECOND DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT. Whoever has sexual
contact or sexual intercourse with a person who has not attained
the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class C felony.



948.07 Child enticement. Whoever, with intent to commit
any of the following acts, causes or attempts to cause any child
who has not attained the age of 18 years to go into any vehicle,
building, room or secluded place is guilty of a Class D felony:
(1) Having sexual contact or sexual intercourse with the child
in violation of s. 948.02, 948.085, or 948.095.

(2) Causing the child to engage in prostitution.
(3) Exposing a sex organ to the child or causing the child to
expose a sex organ in violation of s. 948.10.
(4) Recording the child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(5) Causing bodily or mental harm to the child.
(6) Giving or selling to the child a controlled substance or controlled
substance analog in violation of ch. 961.

Update: To fully understand KK's question. I apologize that this is graphic:


(5) “Sexual contact” means any of the following:
(a) Any of the following types of intentional touching, whether
direct or through clothing, if that intentional touching is either for
the purpose of sexually degrading or sexually humiliating the
complainant or sexually arousing or gratifying the defendant:
1. Intentional touching by the defendant or, upon the defendant’s
instruction, by another person, by the use of any body part
or object, of the complainant’s intimate parts.
2. Intentional touching by the complainant, by the use of any
body part or object, of the defendant’s intimate parts or, if done
upon the defendant’s instructions, the intimate parts of another
person.
(b) Intentional penile ejaculation of ejaculate or intentional
emission of urine or feces by the defendant or, upon the defendant’s
instruction, by another person upon any part of the body
clothed or unclothed of the complainant if that ejaculation or
emission is either for the purpose of sexually degrading or sexually
humiliating the complainant or for the purpose of sexually
arousing or gratifying the defendant.
(c) For the purpose of sexually degrading or humiliating the
complainant or sexually arousing or gratifying the defendant,
intentionally causing the complainant to ejaculate or emit urine or
feces on any part of the defendant’s body, whether clothed or
unclothed.
(6) “Sexual intercourse” means vulvar penetration as well as
cunnilingus, fellatio or anal intercourse between persons or any
other intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person’s body or
of any object into the genital or anal opening either by the defendant
or upon the defendant’s instruction. The emission of semen is
not required.

32 comments:

AvengingAngel said...

I thought he just got caught in a sting, but it looks like he actually had sex with a child under 16. This is even worse than I had originally thought, which was bad enough.

kkdither said...

Not sure how to read that. I think before we make any leaps... "has sexual contact or intercourse" may be deceiving. The word contact may cover what crimes took place on the internet vs. actual physical contact.

Not much can be covered up or concealed at this point. It has hit national news. All cats are out of the bag now....

Under 16 is the most bothersome part of the class C felony... We need to let this play out. That charge could be a picture he had on his computer. Not that that is ok either.... geech!

MinnesotaChick said...

He's in deep shit.

Hey, did you see this on the front page of the JT?

http://www.journaltimes.com/art/newsroom/beckerpage.jpg

AvengingAngel said...

I guess I'm thinking that the quote "arrested on child pornography charges" is a bit misleading.

KK, I think the statute is clear. Intercourse or sexual contact. The contact has to be physical if this statute applies.

MinnesotaChick said...

Gosh. I just read the complaint.

I'm think I'm gonna throw up.

OrbsCorbs said...

I'm too emotionally invested in this.

Seriously, I have to step back or I'm going to blow a gasket.

I don't care how it plays out, FUCK that sonofabitch and all of Racine's power elite who play games with our lives. All of his backers (DRC, RAMAC, J-Wax, etc.) should go on trial with him, but they're scurrying like the rats they are now from the light of day. In a little while, though, they'll be talking about how they suspected something all along, what a shame, yadda, yadda, and then the same old shit will go on and on.

There's an old saying; "You get the leaders that you deserve." Until Racine is ready to face the facts about who and what run this town, nothing will change except the faces on the lying, talking heads.

Sorry for the language. I'm going to go start the truck and warm it up/recharge the battery.

Bailers said...

I'm really just not sure what to say here. Wow.

AvengingAngel said...

RJT states "Attempted" 2nd degree sexual assault, but, at least on CCAP, he is charged with 2nd degree sexual assault, not "attempted"

Lizardmom said...

he is one very sick sick animal, lock him up and lose the key

RWWackoStu said...

JT has one of the chats between Becker (from here on known as sick bastard Gary Becker) and the agent roleplaying as a child Becker wanted to get with. I threw up in my mouth reading it. Sick Bastard Becker will have to resign soon because of this and I really hope his wife leaves him, he is allowed no contact with his minor children and is put in General Population in prision. It also stated he had thousands of images, some of teen and pre-teen girls and over 1800 chats of a sexual nature. Rot in hell Sick Bastard Becker. And as a father of a young girl, if you did touch anyone, I hope they give the fathers 5 minutes alone in a locked room with you.

Beejay said...

How sick...disgusting. And
very, very stupid. Orbs, I am with you...this is enough for anyone to blow a gasket.

Unknown said...

ORBS I agree............ if his constitutes all say they suspected something all along then they are guilty as well of turning a blind eye and letting it continue. If you suspect something (especially something this horrific) and do nothing you're guilty too. I too will wait and see how this one plays out. It all makes me sick. Like KK said earlier he just may take himself out. there is no way else out for him.

homemomof2 said...

I don't even know what to say.

I read the chat on the JT site, wow. I cannot believe someone could talk that way to a child.

SER said...

I guess he won't be out in public much in the next couple weeks.

Huck Finn said...

Okay, want to bet it isn't his fault? Nope, he will admit to a drug and alc problem, and they, not him are responsible for his actions.

OrbsCorbs said...

"Wahlen told Szatkowski that a former IT contractor with the city had reported that in August 2007 he repaired another personal computer belonging to Becker. He turned over a CD of files from that computer, including some that appeared to be child pornography."

Why did Wahlen wait till now to turn over the CD with child pornography? Dereliction of duty. He must go, too. A wholesale housecleaning is in order in Racine. I suspect we would be astounded if we knew the depth of the corruption. Federal and state inquiries, NOW!

Instead, they will let Becker twist in the wind while everyone else covers their ass.

OrbsCorbs said...

Again, the Chief of Police in Racine, Wisconsin has been in possession of pornographic images of children copied from the mayor's personal computer since August of 2007. He said or did nothing about it until now. WTF?!!!

Kcin97 said...

Here's the comlaint in full.
http://www.doj.state.wi.us/news/files/Becker_Criminal_Complaint.pdf

*Disclaimer* This is VERY difficult to read. It is some of THE most disgusting stuff I have ever seen and I can honestly say it will be a long time before I can stop thinking about just how horrible this really is. If anyone was waiting to cast judgement, have them read this.

kkdither said...

I didn't realize that you condensed the definition to protect my 'virgin' eyes... thanks AA.

I wasn't trying to condone him by any means. I guess the way I feel is that all of it is out. Now the consequences need to be served. There is so much widespread attention that I doubt that anyone can cover up too much now, although I'm sure they are scrambling.

Being in the job I am, I watched most of the dateline programs on this topic.

I know that even though those guys never touched the girl, what the men said online was enough 'sexual conduct' or 'contact' to put them away. Also the fact that they showed up defined intent.

The Dateline programs made me sick, so please forgive me... I'll take your review of the chat that was published and not read it.

Abby, the bullet I meant was figuratively. He may just decide that a real one is the easy way out.

AvengingAngel said...

I just read it. This is sick beyond imagination.

drewzepmeister said...

Just read it. Excuse me while I go throw up.

Beejay said...

He is one sick SOB...That being said, why would people admit to knowing of his actions???? I'm with Abby, guilty creeps...you think this makes you look like someone in the know...oh no, it makes you look like perverts!

Beejay said...

OOOH, I feel so much better. Better go check my b/p

Unknown said...

I just heard on fox 6 he's out on $165,000.00 bail........Lock up your kids. How much was tax payers money? He better hope I don't see him anywhere while I'm behind the wheel.Sick f--k!

drewzepmeister said...

His bond was reduced to $10,000 in cash.

SER said...

Just think, this goes on every day. The fact that a city mayor was caught the sensationalism is out of control.

Don’t get me wrong, I by no means is sticking up for him. The one thing that keeps going through my mind is, “how many of the charges are going to be ‘bargained’ away or flat out dropped”? That is what irritates the hell out of me! In addition, if convicted, will he go to some country club prison or a place like Racine Correction Institute (RCI)? You know Bubba and the boys do not like child molesters in the big house!

I cannot imagine how his family feels. Do you support him and help him get counseling or kick him to the curb?

SER said...

Kcin97....

http://www.doj.state.wi.us/news/files/Becker_Criminal

Page has been removed...!!!!

MinnesotaChick said...

I noticed they removed the copy of the conversation he had with the girl/agent too.

I wonder why? Even though it made me sick to read that too.

SER said...

Holy shit...If the Big G wanted to be in the news...he's got.

Google search...Results 1 - 10 of about 9,535 for mayor gary becker

They know him nation wide now.

I guess running for Governor is out of the question Mr. Becker.

SER said...

I stand corrected.

Kcin97....

http://www.doj.state.wi.us/news/files/Becker_Criminal

Page has been removed...!!!!

http://www.doj.state.wi.us/news/files/Becker_Criminal.pdf

link was missing the .pdf

MinnesotaChick said...

That one doesn't work either.

Beejay said...

http://www.doj.state.wi.us

If you go here and look down on the right side of the page, you will find the famous Gary Becker.

This has upset me more than you can imagine. I feel for his children.